<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush est-il un idiot ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/</link>
	<description>J'ai vécu aux Etats-Unis, en Pennsylvanie sur le campus de Pennstate University, de janvier 2003 à novembre 2005. J'ai témoigné grâce à ce blog et vous invite à consulter les archives de cette période. De retour en France, je continue à m'intéresser à ce fabuleux pays.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:41:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inside the USA &#187; Et de 1000 !</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-297398</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside the USA &#187; Et de 1000 !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-297398</guid>
		<description>[...] Un habile politicien doublé d&#8217;un acteur doué qui interprète avec talent un personnage populeux, ou un incompétent notoirement stupide qui s&#8217;est retrouvé dans les habits de président par un heureux concours de circonstances (et une filiation avantageuse) ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Un habile politicien doublé d&#8217;un acteur doué qui interprète avec talent un personnage populeux, ou un incompétent notoirement stupide qui s&#8217;est retrouvé dans les habits de président par un heureux concours de circonstances (et une filiation avantageuse) ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-28343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-28343</guid>
		<description>Evidemment, Scarborough a reçu des critiques suite à cette émission provocatrice.
&gt;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/21/the-backlash-of-scarboroughs-is-bush-an-idiot/&quot;&gt;The Backlash of Scarborough’s “Is Bush an ‘Idiot’?”&lt;/a&gt;

Dans son blog, il donne juste un conseil alors : &quot;Gardez Bush loin de la presse !&quot;

Extrait :
&lt;blockquote&gt;These days the President seems distracted, disjointed and dumbed-down in press conferences. His jokes fall flat and are often inappropriate.

And like Reagan, George W. Bush seems to be getting worse with age instead of better.

When teenage boys misbehave, I blame their fathers. When presidents come up short, I blame their staffs.

In the case of Bush I wonder whether there no one in the West Wing that can tell their boss he needs to spend more time in front of a teleprompter and less time watching ESPN.

Has anyone told him that making jokes about pig roasts after being asked about the bombing of the Beirut airport is not how a Commander in Chief acts in front of the international press corps?

Has anyone considered keeping the President away from the press altogether if he is no longer up to the task of answering questions?

I’m serious.

If George Bush has lost his ability to give a commanding presser, then stage manage him differently. Play to his strengths. Control Bush like Deaver controlled Reagan. Show him only in settings where he is in control.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&gt;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13345463/#060821a&quot;&gt;Keep Bush away from the press&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidemment, Scarborough a reçu des critiques suite à cette émission provocatrice.<br />
&gt;&gt; <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/21/the-backlash-of-scarboroughs-is-bush-an-idiot/">The Backlash of Scarborough’s “Is Bush an ‘Idiot’?”</a></p>
<p>Dans son blog, il donne juste un conseil alors : &#8220;Gardez Bush loin de la presse !&#8221;</p>
<p>Extrait :</p>
<blockquote><p>These days the President seems distracted, disjointed and dumbed-down in press conferences. His jokes fall flat and are often inappropriate.</p>
<p>And like Reagan, George W. Bush seems to be getting worse with age instead of better.</p>
<p>When teenage boys misbehave, I blame their fathers. When presidents come up short, I blame their staffs.</p>
<p>In the case of Bush I wonder whether there no one in the West Wing that can tell their boss he needs to spend more time in front of a teleprompter and less time watching ESPN.</p>
<p>Has anyone told him that making jokes about pig roasts after being asked about the bombing of the Beirut airport is not how a Commander in Chief acts in front of the international press corps?</p>
<p>Has anyone considered keeping the President away from the press altogether if he is no longer up to the task of answering questions?</p>
<p>I’m serious.</p>
<p>If George Bush has lost his ability to give a commanding presser, then stage manage him differently. Play to his strengths. Control Bush like Deaver controlled Reagan. Show him only in settings where he is in control.</p></blockquote>
<p>&gt;&gt; <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13345463/#060821a">Keep Bush away from the press</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghalaad</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-27651</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghalaad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-27651</guid>
		<description>je réponds juste :
&quot;but you must clearly define stupidity first… i think that in this case, being a moron and an as*hole qualifies ;)&quot;

Mais tu dois d&#039;abord définir ce qu&#039;est la stupidité. Je pense que dans le cas qui nous interesse, être un abruti et un trouduc&#039; suffit à la qualifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>je réponds juste :<br />
&#8220;but you must clearly define stupidity first… i think that in this case, being a moron and an as*hole qualifies ;)&#8221;</p>
<p>Mais tu dois d&#8217;abord définir ce qu&#8217;est la stupidité. Je pense que dans le cas qui nous interesse, être un abruti et un trouduc&#8217; suffit à la qualifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jérôme</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26922</link>
		<dc:creator>Jérôme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26922</guid>
		<description>Que penser alors du fait que Bush ait lu L&#039;étranger de Camus pendant ses vacances estivales ?

Elisabeth en a parlé sur son blog, Bush a toujours dit ne pas être un grand érudit et surtout ne jamais lire les journaux...
&gt;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://walisabeth.blogspot.com/2006/08/bush-reads-camus.html&quot;&gt;Bush reads Camus&lt;/a&gt;

Et j&#039;aime bien aussi la question d&#039;introduction de l&#039;émission : vaut-il mieux un président intelligent ou un président qui sache s&#039;entourer avec les bonnes personnes ? Sans doute une façon de se rassurer car Bush dit gouverner plus avec son &quot;instinct&quot;. Un président intelligent saurait bien s&#039;entourer de toute façon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Que penser alors du fait que Bush ait lu L&#8217;étranger de Camus pendant ses vacances estivales ?</p>
<p>Elisabeth en a parlé sur son blog, Bush a toujours dit ne pas être un grand érudit et surtout ne jamais lire les journaux&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt; <a href="http://walisabeth.blogspot.com/2006/08/bush-reads-camus.html">Bush reads Camus</a></p>
<p>Et j&#8217;aime bien aussi la question d&#8217;introduction de l&#8217;émission : vaut-il mieux un président intelligent ou un président qui sache s&#8217;entourer avec les bonnes personnes ? Sans doute une façon de se rassurer car Bush dit gouverner plus avec son &#8220;instinct&#8221;. Un président intelligent saurait bien s&#8217;entourer de toute façon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Adam</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26907</guid>
		<description>Miss lulu, j&#039;ai tout compris de ce que tu dis... sauf le fin.. et la fin m&#039;a l&#039;air particulièrement croustillante...
Ca veut dire quoi in french : &quot;i think that in this case, being a moron and an as*hole qualifies ;)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss lulu, j&#8217;ai tout compris de ce que tu dis&#8230; sauf le fin.. et la fin m&#8217;a l&#8217;air particulièrement croustillante&#8230;<br />
Ca veut dire quoi in french : &#8220;i think that in this case, being a moron and an as*hole qualifies ;)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miss lulu</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26869</link>
		<dc:creator>miss lulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 04:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26869</guid>
		<description>Elisabeth: being a doctor in linguistics, i can tell you that linguistic ineptitude is not necessarily linked to stupidity but stupidity* is often linked with linguistic ineptitude. so... which came first, in the buisson maudit&#039;s case? 

*but you must clearly define stupidity first... i think that in this case, being a moron and an as*hole qualifies ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elisabeth: being a doctor in linguistics, i can tell you that linguistic ineptitude is not necessarily linked to stupidity but stupidity* is often linked with linguistic ineptitude. so&#8230; which came first, in the buisson maudit&#8217;s case? </p>
<p>*but you must clearly define stupidity first&#8230; i think that in this case, being a moron and an as*hole qualifies ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth</title>
		<link>http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26517</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidetheusa.net/2006/08/19/bush-est-il-idiot/#comment-26517</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post, Jerome.  I am putting a link to it on my blog.  I very much liked Joe Scarborough &#039;s conclusion: &quot;We do need a president who is intellectually curious.&quot;

It would be very interesting too, to get the opinion of say, a linguist, to find out if Bush&#039;s &quot;linguistic ineptitude&quot; might be linked to stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post, Jerome.  I am putting a link to it on my blog.  I very much liked Joe Scarborough &#8217;s conclusion: &#8220;We do need a president who is intellectually curious.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be very interesting too, to get the opinion of say, a linguist, to find out if Bush&#8217;s &#8220;linguistic ineptitude&#8221; might be linked to stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
